• Skip to content

LogoCompetition Appeal Tribunal

Site tools

  • Contact us
  • Register for updates
  • Accessibility
  • FOI
  • Sitemap
Search

You are here:

  • Home
  • Judgments
  • Judgment (Costs)

Site Navigation

  • Home
  • Cases
  • Judgments
  • Document archive
  • Rules and Guidance
  • Frequently asked questions
  • About the Tribunal
  • Diary
  • Contact us
  • Links

Judgment (Costs)

Case(s):

  • 1114/1/1/09 (1) Kier Group plc (2) Kier Regional Limited v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1119/1/1/09 Ballast Nedam N.V. v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1127/1/1/09 (1) Bowmer and Kirkland Limited (2) B&K Property Services Limited v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1129/1/1/09 Corringway Conclusions PLC (in liquidation) v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1132/1/1/09 (1) Thomas Vale Holdings Limited (2) Thomas Vale Construction PLC v Office of Fair Trading
  • 1133/1/1/09 (1) John Sisk & Son Limited (2) Sicon Limited v Office of Fair Trading

Neutral citation:

[2011] CAT 33

Published:

21 Oct 2011

Download:

PDF 133KB

Summary:

Judgment of the Tribunal on applications for costs made by Kier, Ballast, Bowmer, Corringway, Thomas Vale and Sisk.

This is an unofficial summary prepared by the Registry of the Competition Appeal Tribunal.

  • © MMXI Competition Appeal Tribunal
  • | Victoria House | Bloomsbury Place | London | WC1A 2EB | United Kingdom
  • Cookies
  • Disclaimer
  • Copyright notice
  • Site Design by: Headscape

Get Acrobat Reader web logo

Use Adobe Reader to download any PDF documents from the Tribunal website.